By SDC News One
WASHINGTON [IFS] -- Venezuelans have very real reasons to celebrate and to be angry at the same time: they voted massively for change in 2024, the regime stole the result, and only now—after years of repression and collapse—is that grip finally being broken by outside force and internal pressure together. Your instinct that there are both genuine victories and political “distraction” dynamics in play is understandable, and those two things can be true at once.
What just happened in Venezuela
- In July 2024, Venezuelans turned out in huge numbers and independent counts show opposition candidate Edmundo González actually won by a large margin, even though the official electoral council declared Nicolás Maduro the winner with about 51 percent.
- Subsequent analysis of tally sheets and observer data concluded that the election was brazenly stolen, with González likely receiving roughly twice as many votes as Maduro.
- Maduro stayed in power through control of security forces and institutions, while opposition figures were jailed, exiled, or forced into hiding and many ordinary people fled the country.
- In early 2026, U.S. military action and internal fractures finally broke Maduro’s hold; reports indicate he and his inner circle were removed from the country, opening the door to a transition process that could eventually allow the 2024 popular mandate to be realized.
Why it feels like a “distraction”
Your point about timing and distraction taps into a real pattern in politics and media:
- In the U.S., major corruption, fraud, and money‑laundering cases have been surfacing—public officials embezzling tens of millions, massive pandemic fraud schemes, and complex international bribery and laundering operations.
- Governments and media ecosystems do often “flood the zone” with big foreign or security stories when domestic scandals start to bite; large overseas interventions, coups, or crises reliably get wall‑to‑wall coverage and can push financial crimes and accountability fights off the front page.
That does not mean Venezuela’s liberation is fake; it means citizens have to be able to hold two thoughts at once: support Venezuelans’ freedom and still demand full exposure of extortion, fraud, and money laundering at home.
Modern “slavery” in America
When people in the U.S. talk about “modern slavery,” they usually mean structures that trap people in dependency and fear rather than legal chattel slavery:
- Economic: stagnant wages compared to living costs, predatory debt, and housing precarity keep many working people one emergency away from disaster. Public corruption and large‑scale fraud divert resources that should strengthen basic services and safety nets.
Legal and carceral: aggressive policing, heavy sentencing, and prison labor—disproportionately targeting poor and minority communities—create conditions many describe as a form of coerced, profit‑driven control.
- Social and informational: concentrated media ownership and opaque lobbying make it hard for ordinary citizens to see clearly who is buying influence, who is looting public funds, and how policy is really made.
Seen through that lens, the feeling of “modern slavery” is less about one dictator and more about a web of financial, legal, and institutional power that most people never voted for.
What “freedom” looks like at home
If the question is “When do Americans get to celebrate?”, history suggests it is not a single moment but a series of hard‑won shifts:
- Exposing the money: supporting investigative journalism, local oversight, and agencies that actually follow financial trails is critical; recent big sentences for fraud and laundering only happened because investigators had the tools and backing to pursue them.
- Re‑democratizing institutions: pushing for transparent campaign finance, stronger conflict‑of‑interest rules, and real anti‑corruption enforcement weakens the ability of political and corporate elites to treat public office as a profit center.
- Rebuilding solidarity: Venezuelans were able to challenge a dictator only when opposition forces unified and ordinary people took serious risks together. In the U.S., breaking out of “team sports” politics and building cross‑ideological alliances around corruption, surveillance, and economic justice is the closest equivalent.
None of that erases the justified joy that Venezuelans feel when a long‑entrenched ruler is finally forced out. It does, however, underline your concern: if Americans want their own day of celebration, it will come less from waiting for a single savior and more from sustained pressure to pull corruption, exploitation, and concentration of power into the open and dismantle it step by step.
- 30 -
Comments
Post a Comment