APACHE JUNCTION, AZ [IFS] -- All modern gun laws are based upon the Black Panther Party.
In the early days of the Black Panther Party, who created , Community Watch, Welfare Checks, Head Start, The Free food for Students programs, and many others that we take for everyday convivence.
After the non-renewal of the Brady Gun Act, by President George W. Bush, the northern part of the America was flooded with guns to and from everywhere.
Lincoln Heights OH Black Panthers
ChatGPT said:
The Lincoln Heights, Ohio, chapter of the Black Panther Party (BPP) was a significant yet often overlooked part of the broader Black Power movement. Lincoln Heights, a historically Black suburb of Cincinnati, became a focal point for activism due to systemic racial discrimination, economic inequality, and police brutality.
Origins and Role of the Lincoln Heights BPP
The Black Panther Party was founded in 1966 in Oakland, California, by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale. It quickly expanded across the country, with various chapters forming in response to local injustices. The Lincoln Heights chapter emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s, inspired by the national BPP’s mission of self-defense, community empowerment, and social programs.
Lincoln Heights, one of the first predominantly Black self-governing municipalities in Ohio, faced challenges such as poor infrastructure, inadequate public services, and racialized policing. The local Black Panther Party chapter sought to address these issues through grassroots organizing.
Community Programs and Impact
Similar to other BPP chapters, the Lincoln Heights group likely focused on initiatives such as:
Free Breakfast for Children Program – ensuring that local kids received nutritious meals.
Health Clinics – providing medical care and health education.
Self-Defense and Anti-Police Brutality Efforts – organizing to protect residents from excessive policing and systemic abuse.
Political Education – raising awareness about civil rights, self-determination, and economic justice.
Conflict and Government Repression
Like many other BPP chapters, the Lincoln Heights group faced heavy surveillance and harassment from law enforcement, particularly under COINTELPRO, the FBI’s counterintelligence program designed to disrupt Black radical movements. This repression, combined with internal divisions and changing political landscapes, contributed to the decline of the BPP by the mid-to-late 1970s.
Legacy
The Lincoln Heights Black Panthers played a crucial role in Ohio’s Black liberation struggle, laying the groundwork for continued activism in Cincinnati and beyond. Their efforts influenced later community-based movements and reinforced the importance of self-sufficiency, political education, and direct action in the fight for racial justice.
Would you like more details on any specific aspect, such as key figures or FBI involvement?
Whites are RAGED that they can no longer BULLY American Blacks after they found Blacks have guns too
ChatGPT said:
That's a bold statement. The history of racial dynamics in America is complex, and while there have always been power struggles, the issue of self-defense and gun ownership among Black Americans is not new. From the Deacons for Defense in the civil rights era to the Black Panthers' armed patrols, Black gun ownership has played a role in self-defense against oppression.
In recent years, there has been a rise in Black gun ownership, with many citing self-protection and constitutional rights as key reasons. Some people might be uncomfortable with this shift, but it's not accurate to generalize an entire racial group’s reaction. The broader discussion should focus on equal rights, responsible gun ownership, and community safety rather than racial conflict.
What’s your take on this? Are you looking at a specific event or trend?
African American Guns Sales are Up after Trump Election?
ChatGPT said:
I can't browse the web right now, but I can provide context on trends related to gun sales and political events. Historically, gun sales among African Americans and other demographic groups tend to increase during times of political uncertainty or after events that raise concerns about gun regulations or personal safety.
After Donald Trump's election in 2016, overall gun sales in the U.S. actually saw a temporary dip because many gun owners felt less urgency to buy firearms, believing that gun rights would be secure under his administration. However, gun sales among African Americans saw a noticeable rise in later years, especially during periods of civil unrest, rising crime concerns, and the pandemic.
In 2020, for example, reports showed a sharp increase in gun ownership among Black Americans, with organizations like the National African American Gun Association (NAAGA) reporting significant membership growth. This trend was partly driven by concerns over racial tensions, protests, and a broader desire for self-defense.
If you're looking for the latest statistics on African American gun sales after Trump's presidency or his latest election campaign, you'd need to check sources like FBI background check data, industry reports, or gun rights organizations. Would you like a general overview of African American gun ownership trends over the past decade?
==============================================================
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/do-the-police-have-an-obligation-to-protect-you/
Do the Police Have an Obligation to Protect You?
The Uvalde, Texas, School District Police Department has received withering criticism for its failure to stop a school gunman who shot and killed 19 children and two teachers.
While the shooter was inside two adjoining classrooms, 19 law enforcement officers stood outside for nearly an hour as they waited for tactical equipment to arrive.
Texas Department of Public Safety Col. Steven McCraw called it "the wrong decision. Period. There's no excuse for that." Calling the response "100% flawed," Thor Eells, executive director of the National Tactical Officers Association, said, "If you're in a classroom with innocent victims and I know that shots have been fired, I need to engage you."
Unfortunately, families of the victims have little legal recourse against the police because police officers are typically protected from lawsuits by qualified immunity. Police occasionally face consequences for their actions, like when Minneapolis officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. But criminal charges against police officers who fail to protect the public are extremely rare.
Questions of Police Duty
The motto, "To Protect and Serve," first coined by the Los Angeles Police Department in the 1950s, has been widely copied by police departments everywhere. But what, exactly, is a police officer's legal obligation to protect people? Must they risk their lives in dangerous situations like the one in Uvalde?
The answer is no.
In the 1981 case Warren v. District of Columbia, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that police have a general "public duty," but that "no specific legal duty exists" unless there is a special relationship between an officer and an individual, such as a person in custody.
The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect. In its 1989 decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the justices ruled that a social services department had no duty to protect a young boy from his abusive father. In 2005'sCastle Rock v. Gonzales, a woman sued the police for failing to protect her from her husband after he violated a restraining order and abducted and killed their three children. Justices said the police had no such duty.
Most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that police could not be held liable for failing to protect students in the 2018 shooting that claimed 17 lives at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
Police Guidelines
Police do have protocols for dealing with dangerous situations like the ones in Uvalde and Parkland, and these protocols emphasize the need for police to take rapid action. The International Association of Chiefs of Police, for instance, says, "Taking action during active shooter incidents, rather than waiting for specially equipped and trained officers, can save lives and prevent serious injuries. Time lost by delayed action is likely to result in additional casualties."
IACP provides guidance on how officers in those situations should assess how to proceed with that rapid response.
No matter how they do it, it will probably be extremely dangerous. They might be risking their own lives.
But as courts have determined, they have no obligation to do that.
So, the next time you see a police car roll by with "To Protect and Serve" emblazoned on the door, keep in mind they have no constitutional obligation to do that.
If you need police to protect you, all you can do is hope they will.
Comments
Post a Comment